Home page      My eu2003.gr      Help      Site map 
23/06/2006 11:28 Local Time 
The Presidency Meetings News Media Service EU/Policies Greece Athens 2004 Youth
Presidency News
Presidency news on Iraq
News from the Athens News Agency
This week
Interviews / Speeches
International Dialogue
Informal General Affairs and External Relations Council 2-3/5/03: Contribution on the issue of EU-USA Relations by Professor Theodore A. Couloumbis

“Healing the West’s wounds”

by Theodore A. Couloumbis

Through the din of countless reports, analyses, commentaries and critiques surrounding the recent war against Saddam in Iraq, a proposition - shared by a number of pessimistic thinkers – is emerging as follows: The world, after regime change in Iraq, is crossing the threshold of a radically changed era. In this allegedly emerging “new global order” the USA is expected to continue playing the role of a lone superpower that acts unilaterally, seeks ex post facto legitimization, and is highly impatient with the gridlocks of international institutions (such as the UN, NATO, EU, et al.). Neoconservative thinking in the Bush administration is said to view the world in Hobbesian terms as gray, miserable, unpredictable and dangerous, with Islamicist international terrorist networks heading the agenda of global threats. In such a “new system”, traditional concepts - such as sovereignty and territorial integrity of states – are being replaced by newly–minted doctrines of “preemptive war” and “humanitarian intervention”. The proponents of “grand systemic change” refer to the “death” of the United Nations, to a “permanent” rift in the EuroAtlantic Community, and to the impending dissolution of an enlarging “Old Europe” that will not be able to withstand the tremors caused by the absorption of a post-communist “New Europe”. For the rest of the world, the pessimistic prognosis involves increasing marginalization of Russia, China and Japan, while the Arab world is expected to be facing mounting challenges that will place traditional monarchies and other authoritarian regimes high on the risk list. A new “domino theory”, made this time in the USA, is expected to result in a chain of preemptive invasions against “rogue states and governments” in the name of democratization, anti-terrorism and the neutralization of weapons of mass destruction.

In my view, the changes that have taken place after Sept. 11, 2001 cannot be compared to the grand systemic change that followed the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the end of the Cold War. In the crucial years 1989-1991 we were escaping from a system of bipolarity and the balance of nuclear terror as well as from a cosmic confrontation of two incompatible ideologies, communism and capitalism. Even then, for a short while, some Cassandra-minded scholars, predicted the birth of a neo-Westphalian “order” based on multipolarity, with tendencies toward the atrophy or fragmentation of post World War II institutions such as the United Nations, the European Union and NATO. These dire predictions were soon challenged by the flow events: after the wars of Yugoslav succession and the rise of new risks (later to be upgraded to threats) such as international terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and transnational criminal cartels, NATO reshaped itself into an alliance that, beyond collective defense and deterrence, would be assuming important functions of collective security (peacekeeping and peacemaking) while acting beyond its traditional area of operations. The USA was universally accepted as the uncontested global superpower, and multilateral structures (UN Security Council, NATO, Group 7/8, the Bretton Woods institutions, the EU, etc.) markedly increased their regulatory responsibilities.

The post Cold War system (let us call it uni-multipolar) reached the apex of its functionality after the September 11 twin towers tragedy in New York. The US, for the first time in its post Civil War history, fell victim to the “bombardment“ of its own territory and instantly secured the sympathy and solidarity of humankind. The French newspaper, Le Monde, did not accidentally use the front page headline “We are all Americans”. The quick, efficient and relatively low cost (in blood and treasure) operation against the Taliban regime in Afganistan secured also the support – or at least the acquiescence – of the majority of the planet’s governments. Unfortunately, however, the unquestionable success to effect regime change in Afganistan, strengthened the hand of neoconservatives in the Bush administration, such as Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle et al. Following its decision to attack Saddam without the authorization of a second UN Security Council resolution, the Bush administration has managed to squander the unconditional good will that the US had enjoyed after the September 11 terrorist attack.
The fighting phase of Gulf-War II appears to be over. Indeed it almost caused a major rupture in Euro-Atlantic and intra-European relations. But a great challenge lies ahead. It involves damage control, humanitarian assistance, post-war administration and state building in war-ravaged Iraq. In a paradoxical sense, winning the peace may give the Western World a grand opportunity to return to a status of interdependence, complementarity, cooperation and unity. In other words, it is high time to return to what was needed after the end of the Cold War, a global concert of powers.

Looking to the future, we need to draw conclusions from the timeless lessons of history. Simply, the planet’s great powers (one could think in terms of the G-7/8/9 or the Quartet plus) have every interest to conserve a state of affairs that perpetuates their position of prominence. Together they can act as the guarantors and legitimizers of the earth’s regulatory mechanisms. Needless to say, “fire fighting” is necessary but not sufficient. It needs to be supplemented by a global strategy of “fire prevention” that will address the key structural challenge of the 21st Century: the growing gap separating the rich in the global north from the poor, hence conflict prone, in the global south. For the EU, involved simultaneously in a deepening and widening process, rebuilding a system of global order with equity and economic sufficiency is both a challenge and an opportunity. We should all remember that whenever, over the years, great powers resorted to force in order to exert their influence it was a sign of impending decline, if not their fall.                

How to search

All months

European Council, Thessaloniki 2003
GYMNICH 2-3/5/2003
Informal European Council - Signing of the Accession Treaty
the official website of the European Year of People with Disabilities
 Citizens' space